<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <id>http://groups.google.com.by/group/sci.logic</id>
  <title type="text">sci.logic Google Group</title>
  <subtitle type="text">
  Logic -- math, philosophy &amp; computational aspects.
  </subtitle>
  <link href="/group/sci.logic/feed/atom_v1_0_msgs.xml" rel="self" title="sci.logic feed"/>
  <updated>2010-03-12T01:22:46Z</updated>
  <generator uri="http://groups.google.com.by" version="1.99">Google Groups</generator>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Smiler</name>
  <email>smi...@joe.king.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-12T01:22:46Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.by/group/sci.logic/browse_thread/thread/c683f4c111bf0cb2/fb0c3ec1bb45a037?show_docid=fb0c3ec1bb45a037</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.by/group/sci.logic/browse_thread/thread/c683f4c111bf0cb2/fb0c3ec1bb45a037?show_docid=fb0c3ec1bb45a037"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Infinite worlds, Quantum indeterminacy, and The endlessly generative</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  You&#39;re totally incapable of saying anything sensible. &lt;br&gt; Nope. No chains bind me to an invisible, unevidenced, superbeing that cannot &lt;br&gt; be shown to exist. &lt;br&gt; I&#39;m thankfully as free from that pathetic mind virus as I was the day I was &lt;br&gt; born. &lt;br&gt; The indoctrination didn&#39;t work on me.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Dono.</name>
  <email>sa...@comcast.net</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-12T00:53:34Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.by/group/sci.logic/browse_thread/thread/3817459b26190d68/fd0ef0597f39e080?show_docid=fd0ef0597f39e080</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.by/group/sci.logic/browse_thread/thread/3817459b26190d68/fd0ef0597f39e080?show_docid=fd0ef0597f39e080"/>
  <title type="text">Re: A Challenge to mathematical physicists</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  There are a few more, PD, Paul Anderson, Tom Roberts, R. Yablon, to &lt;br&gt; name a few. &lt;br&gt; There are also a lot of posers who couldn&#39;t calculate anything even if &lt;br&gt; their lives depended on it. You give one of the posers a problem to &lt;br&gt; solve, you see them bouncing off the walls :-) &lt;br&gt; There a
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>RussellE</name>
  <email>reaste...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-12T00:50:54Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.by/group/sci.logic/browse_thread/thread/771e63b1afc5043a/0d45dc434c9c3c30?show_docid=0d45dc434c9c3c30</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.by/group/sci.logic/browse_thread/thread/771e63b1afc5043a/0d45dc434c9c3c30?show_docid=0d45dc434c9c3c30"/>
  <title type="text">Re: A Three Value Logic</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  This should be: &lt;br&gt; 012012012 A &lt;br&gt; 000111222 B &lt;br&gt; --------- &lt;br&gt; 102111122 A INFER3 B &lt;br&gt; Russell &lt;br&gt; - 2 many 2 count
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>waldofj</name>
  <email>wald...@verizon.net</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-12T00:50:09Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.by/group/sci.logic/browse_thread/thread/3817459b26190d68/80fb617a24da065c?show_docid=80fb617a24da065c</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.by/group/sci.logic/browse_thread/thread/3817459b26190d68/80fb617a24da065c?show_docid=80fb617a24da065c"/>
  <title type="text">Re: A Challenge to mathematical physicists</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  thank gawd someone here knows calculus, because it seems no one else &lt;br&gt; does!
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>RussellE</name>
  <email>reaste...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-12T00:43:50Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.by/group/sci.logic/browse_thread/thread/771e63b1afc5043a/9a09a8d34477498e?show_docid=9a09a8d34477498e</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.by/group/sci.logic/browse_thread/thread/771e63b1afc5043a/9a09a8d34477498e?show_docid=9a09a8d34477498e"/>
  <title type="text">A Three Value Logic</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  We can reason about the unknown by making unknown &lt;br&gt; part of our logic. This is a 3-value logic with &lt;br&gt; the truth values True, False, and Unknown. &lt;br&gt; Notation: &lt;br&gt; 0 = False &lt;br&gt; 1 = True &lt;br&gt; 2 = Unknown &lt;br&gt; A,B,C,... = unassigned variables &lt;br&gt; a0,b1,c2,... = assigned variables &lt;br&gt; &amp;amp; = AND &lt;br&gt; + = OR &lt;br&gt; The value of a variable is assigned.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Dono.</name>
  <email>sa...@comcast.net</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-11T23:59:19Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.by/group/sci.logic/browse_thread/thread/3817459b26190d68/ce1c1e250f23a517?show_docid=ce1c1e250f23a517</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.by/group/sci.logic/browse_thread/thread/3817459b26190d68/ce1c1e250f23a517?show_docid=ce1c1e250f23a517"/>
  <title type="text">Re: A Challenge to mathematical physicists</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  I am fully aware, thank you.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>waldofj</name>
  <email>wald...@verizon.net</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-11T23:56:55Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.by/group/sci.logic/browse_thread/thread/3817459b26190d68/ef23305bd8ee2dd0?show_docid=ef23305bd8ee2dd0</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.by/group/sci.logic/browse_thread/thread/3817459b26190d68/ef23305bd8ee2dd0?show_docid=ef23305bd8ee2dd0"/>
  <title type="text">Re: A Challenge to mathematical physicists</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  so, some else that doesn&#39;t know mutli-variable calculus &lt;br&gt; what a surprise!
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>xxein</name>
  <email>xx...@comcast.net</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-11T23:49:39Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.by/group/sci.logic/browse_thread/thread/3817459b26190d68/d1a93753d1922707?show_docid=d1a93753d1922707</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.by/group/sci.logic/browse_thread/thread/3817459b26190d68/d1a93753d1922707?show_docid=d1a93753d1922707"/>
  <title type="text">Re: A Challenge to mathematical physicists</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  xxein: There is no such real term as a function of intergration. It &lt;br&gt; is an &#39;additional&#39; term introduced to get the right answer for the &lt;br&gt; differentiation we measure.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Peter Webb</name>
  <email>webbfam...@diespamdieoptusnet.com.au</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-11T22:53:07Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.by/group/sci.logic/browse_thread/thread/9bd19051cf7dc41e/1653c0185058d3ae?show_docid=1653c0185058d3ae</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.by/group/sci.logic/browse_thread/thread/9bd19051cf7dc41e/1653c0185058d3ae?show_docid=1653c0185058d3ae"/>
  <title type="text">Re: A set of trascendentals</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  On 9 mar, 14:40, &amp;quot;Peter Webb&amp;quot; &amp;lt;webbfam...@DIESPAMDIEoptusnet .com.au&amp;gt; &lt;br&gt; wrote: &lt;br&gt; I guess that if this set could be defined &lt;br&gt; ___________________________ &lt;br&gt; Cantor actually gave an explicit construction of a list of all agebraic &lt;br&gt; numbers; it is both easy and possible to do. &lt;br&gt; it should have the &lt;br&gt; cardinality of the least uncountable ordinal, i. e. aleph_1,
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Arindam Banerjee</name>
  <email>adda1...@bigpond.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-11T22:25:26Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.by/group/sci.logic/browse_thread/thread/661216f29007cced/d319438ba6389c3c?show_docid=d319438ba6389c3c</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.by/group/sci.logic/browse_thread/thread/661216f29007cced/d319438ba6389c3c?show_docid=d319438ba6389c3c"/>
  <title type="text">Re: EINSTEIN EXERCISING HIMSELF IN CRIMESTOP</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Thanks, Pentcho, now that awful nonsense that Einstein started can finally &lt;br&gt; be abolished, what with my new findings presented to all in Usenet! &lt;br&gt; Cheers, &lt;br&gt; Arindam Banerjee
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Androcles</name>
  <email>headmas...@hogwarts.physics_v</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-11T21:34:39Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.by/group/sci.logic/browse_thread/thread/3817459b26190d68/e7fd216e677570e5?show_docid=e7fd216e677570e5</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.by/group/sci.logic/browse_thread/thread/3817459b26190d68/e7fd216e677570e5?show_docid=e7fd216e677570e5"/>
  <title type="text">Re: A Challenge to mathematical physicists</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  actually a is not a parameter, it&#39;s called a function of integration. &lt;br&gt; It&#39;s one of the things you get when you solve a partial differential &lt;br&gt; equation. It&#39;s very similar to the constant of integration you get &lt;br&gt; when you anti-differentiate a function. And, just as with anti- &lt;br&gt; differentiation, you have to use other aspects of the problem you&#39;re
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Mark Earnest</name>
  <email>gmearn...@yahoo.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-11T21:00:33Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.by/group/sci.logic/browse_thread/thread/c683f4c111bf0cb2/4012eec4cb1f371e?show_docid=4012eec4cb1f371e</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.by/group/sci.logic/browse_thread/thread/c683f4c111bf0cb2/4012eec4cb1f371e?show_docid=4012eec4cb1f371e"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Infinite worlds, Quantum indeterminacy, and The endlessly generative</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Totally incapable of saying anything original. &lt;br&gt; The chains you carry.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>waldofj</name>
  <email>wald...@verizon.net</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-11T20:29:33Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.by/group/sci.logic/browse_thread/thread/3817459b26190d68/474da0d2b089f41e?show_docid=474da0d2b089f41e</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.by/group/sci.logic/browse_thread/thread/3817459b26190d68/474da0d2b089f41e?show_docid=474da0d2b089f41e"/>
  <title type="text">Re: A Challenge to mathematical physicists</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  actually a is not a parameter, it&#39;s called a function of integration. &lt;br&gt; It&#39;s one of the things you get when you solve a partial differential &lt;br&gt; equation. It&#39;s very similar to the constant of integration you get &lt;br&gt; when you anti-differentiate a function. And, just as with anti- &lt;br&gt; differentiation, you have to use other aspects of the problem you&#39;re
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Archimedes Plutonium</name>
  <email>plutonium.archime...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-11T20:14:06Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.by/group/sci.logic/browse_thread/thread/b039eb7cb26e6036/93b67038678765a2?show_docid=93b67038678765a2</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.by/group/sci.logic/browse_thread/thread/b039eb7cb26e6036/93b67038678765a2?show_docid=93b67038678765a2"/>
  <title type="text">Re: (i) more likely to be a 60 degree rotation #508 Correcting Math</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Let me repeat what was found earlier in this book. Earlier, I was &lt;br&gt; looking for the &lt;br&gt; maximum sized triangle on a sphere surface which allows reverse &lt;br&gt; concavity. So that &lt;br&gt; the concave inward &amp;quot;)&amp;quot; of a Hyperbolic triangle cancels the concave &lt;br&gt; outward &amp;quot;(&amp;quot; of &lt;br&gt; a Elliptic triangle leaving behind as a residue, a Euclidean triangle.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Dono.</name>
  <email>sa...@comcast.net</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-11T20:04:23Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.by/group/sci.logic/browse_thread/thread/3817459b26190d68/08dedac7aac2a548?show_docid=08dedac7aac2a548</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.by/group/sci.logic/browse_thread/thread/3817459b26190d68/08dedac7aac2a548?show_docid=08dedac7aac2a548"/>
  <title type="text">Re: A Challenge to mathematical physicists</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  You still the same imbecile, Lebau old fart?
  </summary>
  </entry>
</feed>
